| Pilgrimage of Faith |
Questionnaire 1: Question 9 Summary
With the recent same-sex partnership bill, should the Methodist Church bless same-sex unions?21
people
answered yes, 35 said no, 10 people were unsure and 3 did not answer. 30% of people were
supportive of the
Methodist Church blessing same sex unions.
Although people fall into these categories it is apparent
that people
have different understandings of what a union is, which would need to
be
addressed if Methodism officially began to bless same-sex unions.
From
those
who did not give an answer came comments such as they would have said
yes as
long as
it is not classed as marriage, one commented that if their sexuality is
innate
then it would be wrong to deny them the opportunity of love. There were some who said
they know no reason
to why they shouldn’t be blessed.
One
said that if they are regular worshippers in the church then they
should be,
another commented that they had no difficulty with same-sex unions,
just that
they were unsure whether they should be blessed.
There were one or two who said no, but actually seemed to
have no
problem with same-sex relationships, one stated that they thought it
should
not be
marriage, but that for legal reasons they should be registered, one
said that
the church was not yet ready, one said a civil ceremony was acceptable
but not
a blessing service, another commented that if other denominations
don’t choose
to bless them the Methodist Church could become a ‘blessings
factory.’ Another
person said that there were enough
hotels and registry offices to do them.
If
you take
into account those who have answered other than yes, but actually do
not
express an opinion against same sex relationships, but bring in other
reasons
for their answer, the possible percentage of those who would support
same sex
relationships could be as high as 48%.
The number supporting same sex blessing services within
the Methodist
Church would then fall somewhere between 30% and 48%.
There
were
many reasons given in support of same sex unions, most were because God
welcomes all and that all people should be treated equally. Others commented that if
they want to make
the commitment they should be allowed.
There were a few that said it was time for the church to
move
forward. A couple
said that the church
should bless everyone. One
said that it
was the chance to show others their love and another said that they
need to be
openly recognised. One
person commented
that homosexual people have showed time and time again that their
relationships
are just as committed as heterosexual ones.
One person said that the Christian faith was built on
love, and that
love should be celebrated, whilst another said although they believed
it was
against nature, humanly speaking they should be accepted. Others commented why not,
that it’s an
age-old problem and that they should be able to live as they wish.
The
major
reason against same-sex union blessings were Biblical reasons, with 6
responses
giving that reason, the passages 1 Cor 6:13, Genesis 1:27-28, Mark
10:5-10,
Leviticus 18:22, 1 Cor 6:9-11, Romans 1 were cited as examples. The next major argument
was that God made
humanity male and female, 5 responses referred to this.
3 people said that it was against nature and
unnatural, whilst 2 people said it would make a mockery of marriage, 2
people
said they understood unions and marriage to mean procreation, another
commented
that it is against family life. 2
people said that it was not the will of God.
Other people said that they believed same-sex couples
should not be
married, and one commented that it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. Other comments included
that it was morally
wrong, non-heterosexual people should remain celibate, that this would
encourage the young, it was the work of the devil, and that the church
should
educate about diseases. One
person said
the church was not ready and another said that it would be a slippery
slope,
commenting that the church would next be tapping murderers and con men
on the
back.